Andrew Nikiforuk Books, Books, Books |
The enormity of the damage to land and
water and creatures, the outrageous invasion of the sanctity of innocent
people, and the permanent tragedies created could only be possible in a world
where Big Corporations have become, in fact, law-makers and enforcers in a
world where corporate crime is accepted as normal behaviour.
Slick
Water is, too, the name of the latest book (on theabove subject) written by excellent writer, Andrew Nikiforuk. He was one of the first to tear the Angel
Wings from the Tar Sands operations in a book of that name in 2008: Tar Sands, Dirty Oil and the Future of aContinent.
Readers of this review could do no better
as a beginning of their read through winter-books than to read Slick Water, centering on Canada’s
Fracking Fighter extraordinaire, Jessica Ernst, of Rosebud, Alberta. The book
links her, appropriately, to the long, horrific historical tale of Hydraulic
Fracturing which she has been one of the most indomitable in bringing to
Canadian (and global) public attention.
The beauty of Nikiforuk’s book is that it
brings the marvellous Jessica Ernst to life for readers to come to know … at
the same time as it illuminates the slow (150 year) development of a “greed process”,
Fracking, begun (of course) in the U.S.A., and spread to … wherever on the
globe greed can elbow its way in and gas or oil can be – earth-shatteringly and
poisonously - forced to the surface.
Some enlightened countries outlaw Fracking completely.
Readers will find in this book a hundred
aspects of the Slick Water story that catch and hold their attention. A commanding aspect, linking widely disparate
events and occasions, is caught in one of the most sparkling (if it may be
called that) chapters entitled “The Police Come Calling”.
In the face of allegations of Encana
Corporation violations of the law, Alberta regulator violations of the law,
Alberta lawyers rejecting their obligation and refusing to represent Jessica
Ernst, and shameless misreporting by the Alberta Research Council … and, I add,
an Alberta government pretending to know nothing about anything relevant – a
strange event occurred.
Calling themselves members of the National
Security Enforcement Team (?), RCMP officers first called Jessica Ernst by
telephone and were told by her not to visit her property. Days later, they
arrived at her home unannounced and without any kind of Warrant. The visit – one may speculate – had a number
of purposes. To frighten and coerce
Jessica Ernst. To urge her into naming sympathizers. To please the federal government led by
Stephen Harper, and to please the (then Eternal) Conservative government of
Alberta, and the Encana Corporation, and the cowardly lawyers of Alberta who
would have been pleased to see Ernst frightened away from legal action.
Without intending to be controversial or
extreme, I would say that the RCMP officers, Dennis De Franceschi and Dave
Bibeau, who confronted Jessica Ernst would not be unique as examples of what I
suggest may be called lawless uniformed officers supporting crime in Canada.
One only has to raise one’s eyes to see
extravagant examples. When the murder of
Robert Dziekanski (2007) by RCMP officers occurred in Vancouver International
Airport (the act was renamed for
convenience), it was supported by all levels of the RCMP from the Vancouver
offices to the desk in Ottawa of the national Commissioner of the RCMP. Then, a little later, the fraudulent misuse
of RCMP investigations to “manage” the Mike Duffy case in favour of Stephen
Harper and his close, wealthy ally Nigel Wright is there for all to see. By sleight-of-hand too despicable for words,
the evidence was jimmied to claim Mike Duffy received a bribe of just over
$90,000.00 handed to him as a signed cheque by Nigel Wright. But Nigel Wright did not pay a bribe, it is
claimed. Before the entire population of
Canada the RCMP went along with that complete sham. There is not the slightest
doubt that Commissioner of the RCMP, Bob Paulson, signed off on the spectacular
(and insulting to all Canadians) boondoggle.
Those are national scandals of gigantic
proportion. But all over Canada the RCMP
bends, breaks, and boldly finds ways to violate the law in large and small ways
to serve criminal interests. (Will the new
Liberal government examine that file?)
Let’s put it simply. The whole, cruel torture - through the
Fracking process - of Jessica Ernst and hundreds of others in Canada … and
thousands around the world – is made possible by the sell-out to giant, largely
private Corporations by police, lawyers, the law, the courts, and governments
elected to serve and protect the people.
To this day, the new People’s Government of
Alberta [NDP] has not lifted a finger to lessen the injustice under which
Jessica Ernst staggers.
Indeed, the Alberta NDP government has
approved the continuing role of Gerard Protti, former vp of Encana Corporation
and former president of the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers as top
man at the Alberta Energy Regulator. Both Encana and the AER are named as
delinquent in Jessica Ernst’s case.
If the new government in Ottawa sees fit to
take a harrower through the RCMP – a long overdue undertaking – it should do
the same through the process of appointments to higher courts in all the
provinces. Indeed, it needs to sit with
provincial governments and work slowly and certainly to reconstruct higher court
processes – which are opaque, needlessly bureaucratic, elitist, high-handed,
grossly expensive, purposefully procrastinating, and systemically punitive to ordinary
members of the population seeking remedy for injustices done to them.
Andrew Nikiforuk’s presentation in Slick Water of the negotiation between Jessica
Ernst and the law firm conducting her case – Klippensteins – is deeply
disturbing. Sincerity unforced on both
sides leads to the information that the case might well take twelve years…or
more. (That, I say, is because of the ability of rich corporations to bring
legal proceedings almost to a standstill with – clearly – the assent of the
courts.) The firm’s spokesperson tells Ernst the “case could cost her more than
a million dollars even with the firm’s discounted rates” (p.199) And lawyer
Murray Klippenstein informs her that even if she wins legally, because she
won’t “settle” (agree to a secret award) “you may have to pay the legal fees
and costs of the defendants.” (p. 201)
Ernst replies to him completely in
character. Three things matter. One is
groundwater. The second is the integrity of the democracy she lives in, and the
third is breaking the cycle of abuse. What she does not say (and perhaps
doesn’t know at that early date) is that the cycle of abuse by the poisoners of
water, land, and health is only possible because of the corporation/lawyer/police/court/media
participation in the cycle of abuse quietly smiled upon by corrupt governments.
How to end that cycle and to restore
the integrity of the democracy she lives in is … for all the rest of us to take
on.
Andrew Nikiforuk is – to my mind – very
gentle in his treatment of the Alberta higher court in the case being fought by
Jessica Ernst. Nevertheless, he hints at
what I believe is a shameless intention in the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench
to delay the trial, to increase Jessica Ernst’s costs alarmingly, and to force
her into bankruptcy. I will leave it to
the reader to decide for herself or himself the role of the Alberta court in
Jessica Ernst’s trial … and Andrew Nikiforuk’s assessment of it.
Rejuvenation of the Canadian legal system might
start at the top. What to my mind is the
most useless and the most irresponsible higher court instrument in Canada is
the Canadian Judicial Council – the top regulator of higher court behaviour in
Canada. Presently, to my mind, it is a
sham and a protector of wrong-doing in the higher courts. When an egregious action of sexual misconduct
by a judge is revealed, the CJC might
move to careful action. But in all other cases of serious misconduct (in my
experience with it) the CJC will even cover for (what in other structures would
be called) the frankly criminal activity of judges. (When three higher court judges,
one after the other, are publicly removed from the bench by the CJC for
misconduct in their trust positions, judges across Canada will suddenly become
visibly more upright and … just.)
Justice is in chains in the Jessica Ernst
case against Encana Corporation for fouling her farm, her water, her life, her
hopes for the future. Justice is in
chains in Ernst’s attempts to have the “regulator” of Oil Patch behaviour judged
for failing to do its job of “regulating” (throughout the province). Justice is in chains in the Jessica Ernst
case before the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench (Alberta’s Supreme Court)
because – among other (hugely important) things - the court is not insisting
upon prompt responses from those complained against, not insisting upon prompt
and clean submissions of evidentiary
materials requested by the plaintiff. etc.,etc.
The spotlight is upon Chief Justice NeilWittmann who “volunteered” to take over the case when (surprise!) the judge on
the case was suddenly promoted off it to the Appeals Court. (Her promotion had
to involve Stephen Harper’s cabinet and the senior operatives of the Alberta
Court of Queen’s Bench… and who else?)
The case is momentous – calling into question the activities of a huge
private Oil Patch operator and the
government of Alberta’s regulator.
The action of Chief Justice Neil Wittmann to force a Supreme Court of
Canada appeal about his ruling that the Alberta regulator is “beyond” the reach
of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the Canadian Constitution is seen by
some as a vexatious and obnoxious action to delay the trial – and cause Jessica
Ernst enormously increased costs.
If the Honourable Neil Wittmann’s action
has been, in fact, a move to show sympathy for the bodies Jessica Ernst is
acting against … then justice in Alberta is truly in chains. But Jessica Ernst has been a major person in
forcing the unshackling of truth about “Fracking”. She has been major in
forcing the unshackling of truth about the abuse of land and people by Big Oil
and Gas in Alberta – and its “buy-off” techniques. She has been major in
exposing the Alberta Regulator as a friend of the violators. She may well prove
to be instrumental in unshackling a truth about large-scale corruption in the
Court of Queen’s Bench, Alberta. Then the chains will begin to come off - even off
the legal system in Canada.
Contact: Robin Mathews
Ernst v. Fracking et al Links & Resources
**************************
Jessica Ernst can be contacted at contact@jessicaernst.ca.
This website is maintained by Jessica Ernst’s legal counsel for the purpose of providing information to the public on what our client believes are important issues of public interest.
Klippensteins, Barristers and Solicitors
160 John Street, Suite 300
Toronto, Ontario M5V 2E5
Canada
Ernst v. Fracking et al Links & Resources
1 comment:
Is there a parallel between this and BC Rail? I mean the machinations of the people in charge. Were the people of British Columbia jerked around as Ms. Ernst is and has been? What if Basi/Verk had not been bought off?
Post a Comment